Apparently, the two natures exist, judging by certain psychoanalytic writings; however, can this be further developed?
What would be interesting is to see who benefits from this (or, as they say: who benefits from the crime...)
What can slander or backbiting bring to the person who engages in it, and one can also see that sometimes the slanderer or backbiter benefits the victim, particularly in celebrity magazines, where it can be seen that this allows some to derive financial subsidies or even notoriety from it…
But let's leave the stars aside
Sometimes, slander is the concern of a spontaneous friendly solidarity from onlookers…
but also that the slanderer becomes aware of their vileness and transforms…
What do you think?
Where are these natures that are thus and will always remain so, for that is what gives them their charm or their beauty of dart?
What would be interesting is to see how the two of them experience things internally; do they carry this weight of guilt or not?
How are they so confident in themselves that the culprit is the one who provokes this attitude in them?
What do you think?
A+
lolly