Dear Lolly…
What a topic that is!
I was married for barely two years, and then I lived for 20 years in a common-law relationship with the father of my children.
My son, after 10 years of living together, has decided to take the plunge and get married!
My best friend says, “Marriage, absolutely not, never again.”
Personally, now, I don’t see the difference between a marriage and a common-law partnership.
As for saying that marriage strengthens bonds and that one is more independent in a common-law relationship, that is completely false, or even worse.
Legally, it was much easier for me to divorce than to separate. The law mandates separate residences, and there is nothing to prevent one partner in a common-law union from living under the same roof as their children.
So I would say, if you think you might have to part ways with your partner one day, especially if you have children together, start by getting married; it will be easier, contrary to what one might think.
Otherwise, if we emphasize the legal aspect, my view is that the union between two partners lies in their hearts, not in a registry.
It is not civil registry entries that serve as proof of a couple’s love.
If a man I liked ever asked me to marry him, I think I would be very surprised and wouldn’t even know what to say to him. I think I would be so stunned by his proposal that I’d be left speechless!
But perhaps I have passed the age for that kind of young girl’s dream.
I think marriage is mostly symbolic; it is part of an institution that was meant to be reassuring, but things have evolved (for better or for worse…), and now marriage has lost some of its value, just like love—it no longer rhymes with forever.
Becs